I think CEF's perform a needed role in the investment universe; specialized mutual funds that can get into niches that OEF's cannot because of the fund flow or other structural problems.
The problem with CEF's is transparency and shareholder information. They're not adopting to the times and are clinging to 20th Century standards and methods. Change is needed here to broaden participation in the funds. At this point in time, most folks are interested in the leverage issues and whether funds are underwater. Yet, fund sponsors have disseminated limited information on this issue or they might or might not respond to individual shareholders calls or requests. IMHO, that needs to change.
Speaking of Herzfeld, here's a link to his latest free report from June:
http://www.herzfeldresearch.com/Jun08WholeRpt.pdf
Great summary of events to that time frame and he also highlited that UIT's were buying CEF's to bundle into their portfolios. The report is worth a read for the ARPS and leverage issue summaries. His index comprises only 15 funds, so it's a very limited index in its tracking ability. I wouldn't pay too much attention to it.
Since Herzfeld is an insider, he's not going to reveal what's really going on down deep inside the industry or provide us with any metrics for valuation. Simple buy/sell recommedations don't do much for me.
If anyone has a copy of the old printed M* reports from the '90's or any Lipper reports, I'd appreciate seeing a copy to see if there are any metrics for valuation that aren't currently available or used in the current info.
Tim